Recently, the Supreme People’s Court (SPC) Judicial Cases Research Center (最高人民法院司法案例研究院)(affiliated with the National Judicial College) issued a big data report on contested divorces in 2016-17, a follow up to their report of 18 months ago (the charts below are from the report). The report was done in conjunction with the SPC’s big data center. The Judicial Cases Research Center publishes big data reports occasionally, some in the form of this report.
As noted in earlier blogposts, the 4th Judicial Five Year Plan calls for reforms in judicial statistics:
Reform mechanisms for judicial statistics with the idea of “big data, big picture, and big service” as a guide; make a system of standards for judicial statistics that has scientific classifications and complete information, gradually building a model for analysis of empirical evidence that complies with the reality of judicial practice and judicial rules, and establish a national archive of court judgment opinions and a national center for big data on judicial information.
As I discuss in one of my forthcoming articles, the language quoted above contains no commitment to release to the public any of this new and improved big data, but careful observation has revealed that some of the more detailed big data from the SPC big data center is being published in one of the SPC’s academic journals.
It shows that in 2017, first instance contested divorces exceeded 1,400,00, somewhat more than in 2016.
Almost three quarters (73%)of the plaintiffs in first instance divorce cases were women.
Mostly couples sued for divorce on the basis that they no longer were compatible, and in about 15% of cases domestic violence was alleged.
Domestic violence was alleged most often in Guangdong, Guizhou and Guangxi.
Most of the domestic violence alleged was physical violence.
In the first instance divorce cases, 91% of the domestic violence was committed by men on women.