I write on socialist core values and Chinese judicial interpretations with some trepidation. Not because I have trouble deciphering socialist core values, but because the two documents core to the analysis are available in summary form only, as at least one source has mentioned that the SPC document is classified. This blogpost is based on those summaries, primarily on the summary provided by Supreme People’s Court (SPC) Research Office (研究室) head Jiang Qibo of its five-year work plan (2018-2023) to incorporate fully socialist core values into judicial interpretations (关于在司法解释中全面贯彻社会主义核心价值观的工作规划（2018-2023).) in 2015 the SPC had issued a general document on socialist core values.
As explained below, it appears that the SPC is both “serving the greater situation” by implementing in the courts the Party’s plan to integrate socialist core values in plans to legislate and amend legislation（社会主义核心价值观融入法治建设立法修法规划） while at the same time seeking to deal with many of the difficult legal issues that face it.
For those unfamiliar with the SPC’s Research Office, (as I am writing in yet another academic article stuck in the production pipeline), 2007 SPC regulations place it as the gatekeeper for reviewing proposals, examining and coordinating the drafting of judicial interpretations. It also acts as the liaison when other central institutions forward their draft legislation and judicial interpretations to the SPC for comments, coordinating the SPC’s response with other divisions and offices, with a knowledgeable person noting that “the view of the Research Office prevails.”
The critical language in the Party’s plan for the SPC and its judicial interpretations appears to be: “judicial interpretations should be amended and improved in a timely manner according to the demands of socialist core values” (司法解释，要按照社会主义核心价值观的要求，及时进行修订完善). This language appears only in the SPC’s summary of its own plan and not in the earlier reports on the original plan.
The SPC’s approach to implementing the Party’s plan was to pull together all the demands on and recommendations to it to draft judicial interpretations–some in Party documents, others in recommendations from the National People’s Congress (NPC) Standing Committee (presumably its Legislative Affairs Commission), proposals from NPC and CPPCC delegates, a collation of proposals concerning judicial interpretations from the lower courts, plus the needs of the courts (as seen from the SPC), and the SPC’s other drafting commitments.
The areas of law that Jiang Qibo are relevant to a broad range of persons, from commercial lawyers to environmentalists, to those interested in the rights of women and the elderly. Some involve new areas for judicial interpretations while others require expanding old ones.
Jiang Qibo classified the interpretations into five broad categories:
- The category of patriotism, dedication, and harmony includes the following (important) judicial interpretations. It appears the #1 Civil Division will take the lead on these, and I trust will engage in public consultation:
- Amending those on the right to reputation and the right to honor to include better protection for heroes and martyrs (as to be expected and was flagged in a recent blogpost); See some earlier translations here on the SPC’s statements on the earlier heroes and martyrs litigation;
- amending and improving judicial interpretations related to the Marriage Law and family law, etc. I recommend this article by Professor Yang Lixin of Renmin University (formerly an SPC judge) for his forthright analysis of the state of Chinese family law and current important issues (children born out of wedlock, same-sex marriage, wills, surrogacy, etc);
- improving the systems for trying family-related cases (Judge Du Wanhua is overseeing the pilot projects in this area); improve the legal protection of juveniles; prevent and punish school bullying, etc. (the SPC has been doing research on improving juvenile law and preventing school bullying for several years).
- amending/improving labor dispute judicial interpretations (these fill in the holes in labor legislation) As has been discussed earlier on this blog, the number of labor cases in the courts has increased.
2. The category of equality, justice, democracy, and rule by law:
- Improve protection of property, especially non-public property, in criminal law. (See last year’s blogpost on this). Recent developments in China have seen greater use of confiscation procedures, and as this blog highlighted earlier this year, property protections are inadequate.
- Improve the rules for trying property condemnation cases, to better protect the rights of those whose property is being acquired.
- A judicial interpretation on hearing disputes over the use of personal information is needed (project approval for this has been given). Also work will start on a judicial interpretation on the protection of wild animals and protected species (see NPC Observer’s article on a related case), and the enforcement judicial interpretation is also to be amended (because of the SPC’s campaign to improve enforcement).
3. In the category of justice, friendship, and cooperation are the following:
- an interpretation on self-defense (recently in the news in China in several cases, such as the Yu Huan case and a case in Kunshan);
- also improving the SPC’s2016 policy document on judicial legal assistance (legal aid as arranged by the courts).
4. On setting out further details to the broad principles in the General Part of the Civil Code (also Judge Du Wanhua continues to be involved with this):
- amending the contract law judicial interpretations;
- amending the judicial interpretations on the criminal punishment production and sale of fake and shoddy goods;
- amending the judicial interpretation on food and drug safety crimes;
- criminal punishment of fraudulent litigation (just released);
- rules on hearing cases in which the government is a contracting party, and issuing a judicial interpretation at an appropriate time.
5. On prosperity, creativity, and greenness:
- amending the judicial interpretation relating to villages, to provide services for rural revival;
- amending real estate related judicial interpretations;
- amending finance related judicial interpretations, to ensure national financial safety and prevent a financial crisis (the criminal law in this area is quite unclear);
- amending the judicial interpretations on bankruptcy law;
- improving judicial interpretations related to intellectual property law (IP law), see more below;
- amend the judicial interpretations related to environmental protection;
- amend the judicial interpretations on maritime trade and other maritime matters.
On the intellectual property front:
- The SPC will look into punitive damages for patent, copyright, and other IP infringement so that in serious cases punitive damages can be imposed and having the infringer responsible for the costs to the rights holder of stopping the infringement;
- in the next five years, if the legislation is not amended it will work on using market value as a basis for damages;
- it will work to better coordinate between administrative and judicial enforcement of IP rights;
- it will work on guidance on civil cases that arise because of monopolistic conduct;
- protection of plant species;
- it will look into new issues related to unfair competition cases, also in trade secret cases, and new issues related to civil trademark disputes;
- research evidence issues in IP cases, look into having IP technical investigators involved in litigation;
- research jurisdiction in IP and unfair competition cases;
- look into preliminary preservative measures in IP cases (mentioned in an earlier blogpost).