As everyone who has spent some time paying close attention to the Chinese legal system knows, the Chinese Communist Party has a system (系统) of Political Legal Committees (政法委员会 or 政法委) that oversee, coordinate, and implement Communist Party policy in the legal institutions–public security (and state security), procuratorate, courts, and justice (公检法司). The Political-Legal Committees, that exist at every level of the Communist Party and government, have been existence for many years. This quick blogpost reports on two unnoticed phenomena:
- the Political-Legal Committees “coming out”; and
- the Supreme People’s Court (Court) opening discussion on the relationship among the legal institutions.
What I mean by “Political-Legal Committees ‘coming out'” is that from the central level on down, Political Legal Committees now have their own websites that link to the institutions (with the exception of state security) at the same level of government. At the top level is Chinapeace, featuring articles related to Party policy (and other topics) in the legal institutions and linking horizontally to the websites of those institutions and vertically (downwards) to the local political legal committees. Chinapeace has links to the websites of local political-legal committees at the provincial level (or equivalent)–such as the Guangdong Political-Legal Committee.
The Communist Party must have issued a decision to permit these websites to be established. It means that the Communist Party has decided that the Political Legal Committees need to be on the Internet to promote the Party’s policies. For the veteran observers of the Chinese legal system, it is an amazing phenomenon, when for many years, these committees had been in the metaphorical closet.
The second unnoticed phenomenon is that at the end of October, the Court has posted on its website a link to the newest topic for discussion for a project it co-sponsors with Tsinghua University on judicial reform–the relationship between the legal institutions and whether they should be “adjusted.”
The Constitution (Article 135) sets out the basic principle–they shall “in handling criminal cases, divide their functions, each taking responsibility for its own work, and they shall coordinate their efforts and check each other to ensure the correct and effective enforcement of law” . It is significant that the Court has raised this, especially publicly. It is another issue for all concerned about the Chinese legal system to watch.
2 thoughts on “Communist Party Political-Legal Committees Come out of the Closet and Onto the Web”
Susan, your readers may be interested in a blog I posted today (Nov. 10) on the development of IPR related case law by the SPC and other courts (www.chinaipr.com). Mark Cohen.